The Stupid Comment Section
← Hoaxes

Past hoax · Filed Oct 16, 2026

MAGA Assaulted Paul Pelosi Hoax

A MAGA attacker broke in and beat Paul Pelosi because of right-wing rhetoric.

The claim

A MAGA attacker broke in and beat Paul Pelosi because of right-wing rhetoric.

What it was

The attacker, David DePape, had a long record of delusions and left-wing obsessions. The early caption was a partisan hit job.

Timeline

  1. Oct 28, 2022

    David DePape breaks into the Pelosi house and beats Paul Pelosi with a hammer.

  2. That weekend

    The caption is a MAGA attacker sent by right-wing rhetoric. A separate rumor says Pelosi knew him.

  3. The record

    The lover story is false. The assault is real. DePape’s trail is not a campaign membership. He is later convicted of the attack.

  4. The verdict

    The conviction is for the hammer attack. It does not include a finding that Pelosi knew him, or that a campaign sent him.

What aired

When David DePape broke into the Pelosi house in San Francisco in October 2022 and beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer, the early caption was that a MAGA extremist had done it because of right-wing rhetoric. A second, competing rumor said Pelosi knew the man. Both versions were on the air while the police report was still thin.

The record

The assault was real. DePape was convicted of it. His record was not a campaign volunteer’s. It was a long mess of conspiracy, nudity as protest, and political obsessions that ran through the left as well as through whatever else was on his hard drive. The lover story was false. The “MAGA sent him” story was a caption in search of a membership card he did not have.

Left out

Left out was the man’s actual trail of posts and the speed of the partisan label. Also left out was the local detail that makes a break-in a break-in: a glass door, a 911 call, a hammer. Those details supported a violent intruder. They did not support a party. The party was added.

Why it stuck

It stuck because the hammer and the speaker’s husband are a perfect symbol, and symbols get authors. The author the audience wanted was the other tribe. DePape was too incoherent to be a clean agent of that tribe. The incoherence was edited out until the conviction, and by then the symbol had its author.