The Stupid Comment Section
← Hoaxes

Past hoax · Filed Oct 16, 2026

Russian Bounties Hoax

Russia paid the Taliban bounties to kill American troops, and Trump did nothing.

The claim

Russia paid the Taliban bounties to kill American troops, and Trump did nothing.

What it was

The intelligence was unconfirmed when it was briefed as fact. It did not hold up as the story that was told.

Timeline

  1. Jun 26, 2020

    The New York Times reports that Russia offered bounties to kill U.S. troops and that Trump had been briefed and done nothing.

  2. That week

    CNN carries it as abandoned soldiers. The intelligence is an assessment, not a confirmed program.

  3. Later

    The commander in Afghanistan says he has no corroboration that bounties changed the threat. The payroll version does not get established.

  4. 2021

    The next administration does not produce the confirmed bounty program the 2020 story described.

What aired

In June 2020 the New York Times reported that Russian military intelligence had offered bounties to the Taliban to kill American troops, and that Trump had been briefed and done nothing. CNN treated it as a scandal of abandoned soldiers. The graphic might as well have been a price list.

The record

The intelligence was an assessment with dissent inside the government, not a confirmed operation. The commander responsible for the war, General Frank McKenzie, said he had no corroboration that any bounty had changed the threat to his troops. The Biden administration did not later produce the proof the 2020 story had spoken with. An unconfirmed report had been aired as a payroll.

Left out

Left out was the word “unconfirmed,” and the agencies that did not buy it. Also left out was the political use. It arrived in an election year as proof the commander in chief was in Russia’s pocket, which folded it into the older collusion story. A battlefield rumor became a character charge.

Why it stuck

It stuck because dead soldiers and Russian money are an unbeatable combination, and “briefed and did nothing” makes the villain passive and guilty at once. A general saying he could not corroborate it is a buzzkill. Buzzkills ran after the charge, not instead of it.