The Stupid Comment Section
← Hoaxes

Past hoax · Filed Oct 16, 2026

COVID Deaths are Overcounted Is a Conspiracy Theory Hoax

Saying COVID deaths were overcounted was a conspiracy theory.

The claim

Saying COVID deaths were overcounted was a conspiracy theory.

What it was

Hospitals and death certificates counted deaths with COVID as deaths from COVID. The objection was about the count, and the count was loose.

Timeline

  1. Apr 2020

    Federal guidance tells doctors to list COVID on a death certificate when it is assumed to have contributed, including deaths of people who were positive and died of something else.

  2. 2020–2021

    Saying the totals mix “with” and “of” is treated on air as a conspiracy theory.

  3. The count

    The number is real under that loose rule. The rule was public. It was not a secret plot, and it was not a tight count of people killed by the virus alone.

  4. The guidance

    The April 2020 instruction is public the whole time that quoting it is being called a conspiracy theory.

What aired

Anyone who said the COVID death totals were inflated was filed, on air, as a conspiracy theorist. The official number was the number. Questioning it was treated as a cousin of claiming the hospitals were empty.

The record

The counting rule was looser than the tone of those segments. Federal guidance told doctors to put COVID on a death certificate when it was assumed to have contributed, including when the person died of something else while positive. Died with and died of were added together. Hospitals also had a financial reason to note the virus. Noticing the rule was not a claim that people were not dying.

Left out

Left out was the form itself. A conspiracy theory needs a secret. The guidance was public. Also left out was the honest version of the objection: the total was a real count of a loose definition, not a fake count of a tight one. Collapsing that into “the deaths aren’t real” made the objector sound insane, which made the loose definition untouchable.

Why it stuck

It stuck because the alternative was admitting that a sacred number had a methodology, and methodologies can be criticized without insulting the dead. Criticism was easier to call fringe. The fringe label protected the methodology from the one question it could not survive on television: with, or of?